A Comparison of Features Among ETD Submission Systems

dc.contributor.affiliationTexas State University
dc.contributor.authorLarrison, Stephanie
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-28T15:01:39Z
dc.date.available2014-10-28T15:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-26
dc.descriptionPoster presentation for the 2013 Texas Conference on Digital Libraries (TCDL).en_US
dc.description.abstractMy poster will provide a comparison of features offered by different Electronic Thesis and Dissertation submission systems in an easy to understand and visually appealing table. The intent of this poster is to offer a quick snapshot of what ETD systems can do to help potential and current users determine which products may best fit their needs. It will be of interest to those involved in the policies, management, publication or curation of theses and dissertations at an institution. I will be comparing Vireo, the open-source Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Submission and Management software developed by the Texas Digital Library, and Proquest’s free web-based ETD Administrator. I also plan to add additional systems to the comparison chart as information is gathered.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/66991
dc.languageen_US
dc.sourceTexas Conference on Digital Libraries (TCDL), 2013, Austin, Texas, United States
dc.subjectETDsen_US
dc.subjectETD submission systemsen_US
dc.subjectdissertations
dc.subjectVireo
dc.subjectProquest ETD administrators
dc.titleA Comparison of Features Among ETD Submission Systemsen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
tcdl2013_larrison_comparison_of_features.pdf
Size:
551.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: