PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS USING SEQUENTIAL DETECTION IN A SERIAL MULTI-HOP WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK
dc.contributor | Chamberland, Jean-Francois | |
dc.creator | Choi, Dae H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-01-16T02:27:38Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-07T19:56:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-01-16T02:27:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-07T19:56:57Z | |
dc.date.created | 2008-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-01-16 | |
dc.description.abstract | Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been developed for a variety of appli- cations such as battle?eld surveillance, environment monitoring, health care and so on. For such applications, the design of WSN has been limited by two main resource constraints, power and delay. Therefore, since wireless sensors with a small battery are subject to strict power constraints, the e?cient usage of power is one of the im- portant challenges. As delay-sensitive applications are emerging, they have been in demand for making a quick decision with the enhanced detection accuracy. Under above constraints, we propose a sequential detection scheme and compare it with a Fixed-sample-size (FSS) detection scheme in terms of power and delay. Our main contribution is to analyze the overall system performance of the proposed scheme in the statistical signal processing framework under of power and delay constraints. In this thesis, we evaluate the overall system performance of sequential detection scheme in a serial multi-hop WSN topology. For sequential detection, the sensor nodes continue to relay the observations to the next node until the sequential detector makes a ?nal decision based on the observations. On the other hand, the FSS detector waits until all the observations come to the fusion center, and then gives a ?nal decision. For a fair comparison of the two schemes with respect to power and delay, the initial step is to ?nd the same detection performance region between the two schemes. Detection performance is evaluated with performance measures such as false alarm, miss and prior probability. Simulation results show that each scheme has an advantage and a disadvantage concerning power and delay respectively. That is, sequential detection performs more e?ciently in delay since the number of samples in sequential detection is less on average than in FSS detection to obtain the same detection performance. However, FSS detection with a small number of packet paths consumes less power than sequential detection. Through the analysis of a cost function, which is a linear combination of power and delay, we compare the cost value between the two schemes and ?nd less region of the cost value in both schemes. This analysis will provide a good starting point and foundation for designing an e?cient multi-hop WSN with small power and delay constraints. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-08-31 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject | sequential detection | |
dc.title | PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS USING SEQUENTIAL DETECTION IN A SERIAL MULTI-HOP WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK | |
dc.type | Book | |
dc.type | Thesis |