The art of manipulation : gender inequity and the picture study movement

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorBolin, Paul Erik, 1954-en
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBain, Christina Ben
dc.creatorKern, Jasmin Nikolen
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-27T15:57:41Zen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-11T22:31:55Z
dc.date.available2017-05-11T22:31:55Z
dc.date.issued2012-08en
dc.date.submittedAugust 2012en
dc.date.updated2013-02-27T15:57:42Zen
dc.descriptiontexten
dc.description.abstractThis study locates and examines the relationship between societal gendered expectations in nineteenth century United States and the content of a picture study manual published at the turn of the century: Lucy Langdon Williams Wilson’s Picture Study in Elementary Schools: A Manual for Teachers (1909). Critical analysis of the images, artists, and content of the picture study manual provides insight into the relationship between curricular materials and the social climate during which they were produced. Recognition of this connection will enable art educators and curriculum developers to produce materials and textbooks conscious of the potential bias and marginalization of students.en
dc.description.departmentArt Educationen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/19641en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.subjectArten
dc.subjectArt educationen
dc.subjectGenderen
dc.subjectGender inequityen
dc.subjectPropagandaen
dc.subjectPicture studyen
dc.subjectArt historyen
dc.subjectCurriculumen
dc.subjectCurriculum developmenten
dc.titleThe art of manipulation : gender inequity and the picture study movementen

Files

Collections

University of Texas at Austin