A comparison of diagnostic techniques for detecting salmonella spp in equine fecal samples using culture methods, gel-based pcr, and real-time pcr assays
| dc.contributor | Simpson, R. Bruce | |
| dc.creator | Smith, Shelle Ann | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2007-09-17T19:30:35Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-07T19:53:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2007-09-17T19:30:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-07T19:53:12Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2003-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007-09-17 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Salmonellae are enteric bacteria infecting animals and humans. Large animal clinics and Veterinary Teaching Hospitals are greatly affected by Salmonella outbreaks and nosocomial infection. The risk of environmental contamination and spread of infection is increased when animals are confined in close contact with each other and subjected to increased stress factors. This study was designed to compare double-enrichment culture techniques with Gel-based and Real-time PCR assays in the quest for improved diagnostic methods for detecting Salmonella in equine fecal samples. 120 fecal samples submitted to the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital at Texas A&M University (CML, VMTH, TAMU) were tested for Salmonella using all three techniques. Double-enrichment bacterial culture detected 29 positive results (24%), Real-time PCR detected 33 positive results (27.5%), and Gel-based PCR detected 73 positives results (60.8%). While culture and real-time PCR methods had similar results, the gel-based PCR method detected many more positive results, indicating probable amplicon contamination. Real-time PCR can be completed as soon as the day after submission while culture techniques may take 2 to 5 days to complete. However, viable bacterial cells are needed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and serotyping: both important for epidemiological studies. Therefore, double-enrichment bacterial culture performed concurrently with real-time PCR methods could be efficient in clinical settings where both accurate and expedient results are required. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/5735 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Texas A&M University | |
| dc.subject | Salmonella | |
| dc.subject | culture | |
| dc.subject | PCR | |
| dc.title | A comparison of diagnostic techniques for detecting salmonella spp in equine fecal samples using culture methods, gel-based pcr, and real-time pcr assays | |
| dc.type | Book | |
| dc.type | Thesis |