Lift-off performance in flexure pivot pad and hybrid bearings

dc.contributorChilds, Dara
dc.creatorMertz, David Hunter
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-15T00:12:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-16T01:25:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-07T19:56:00Z
dc.date.available2010-01-15T00:12:54Z
dc.date.available2010-01-16T01:25:14Z
dc.date.available2017-04-07T19:56:00Z
dc.date.created2008-12
dc.date.issued2009-05-15
dc.description.abstractThree flexure pivot pad bearings (FPBs) with different preloads are evaluated for use in high performance applications by comparing them to a hybrid hydrostatic bearing (HHB). One application of these bearings is in turbopumps for liquid rocket engines. To evaluate bearing performance, the lift-off speed of the shaft from the bearing surface is experimentally determined. Experimental data of lift-off are collected using a circuit running through the shaft and the designed bearing. Other methods for measuring liftoff speeds were attempted but did not yield consistent results. Water is used as a lubricant to simulate a low viscosity medium. In comparison to load-capacity-based predictions for FPBs, the experimental results showed lower lift-off speeds, higher load capacities, higher eccentricity ratios, and lower attitude angles. The bearings? predicted load capacity determined lift-off speed predictions, but the experimental results show no clear trend relating lift-off speed to load capacity. This was for a range of running speeds, with the design speed defined as the final speed in a particular test case. At 0.689 bar supply pressure and for a design speed of 3000 rpm, the HHB showed greater load capacities and lower eccentricities than the FPBs, but the FPBs had lower lift-off speeds and attitude angles. In fact, the FPBs in the load-between-pad orientation outperformed the HHB in the load-on-pocket orientation with lower lift-off speeds for the shaft weight-only case. An increased supply pressure lowered the lift-off speeds in the HHB tests. If the load in the bearing application remains relatively small, a FPB could be substituted for an HHB.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3197
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectLift off
dc.subjectbearing
dc.subjectlubrication
dc.subjecthydrodynamic bearing
dc.subjecthydrostatic bearing
dc.subjectturbopump
dc.titleLift-off performance in flexure pivot pad and hybrid bearings
dc.typeBook
dc.typeThesis

Files