The Hellenistic pottery from the Panayia Field, Corinth : studies in chronology and context
| dc.contributor.advisor | Gates-Foster, Jennifer | en |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shelmerdine, Cynthia W. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeeMember | Rabinowitz, Adam | en |
| dc.contributor.committeeMember | Friesen, Steven | en |
| dc.contributor.committeeMember | Sanders, Guy | en |
| dc.creator | James, Sarah Anne, 1976- | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-11-17T15:41:01Z | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-11T22:23:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-11-17T15:41:01Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-11T22:23:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-12 | en |
| dc.date.submitted | December 2010 | en |
| dc.date.updated | 2011-11-17T15:41:29Z | en |
| dc.description | text | en |
| dc.description.abstract | The new chronology of Corinthian fine ware presented in this dissertation is based on pottery from the recently discovered Hellenistic deposits (dated from the 3rd to 1st c. B.C.) in the Panayia Field. This new Panayia Field chronology was created by first quantifying the pottery in each deposit and then seriating the deposits in order to plot the initial production and use-life of individual ceramic shapes. The results substantially revise the previous chronology of Corinthian Hellenistic pottery published in Corinth VII.3, which has long been acknowledged as problematic by scholars of the period. One key aspect in which the Panayia Field chronology differs from its predecessor is in the recognition that pottery production resumed in Corinth after the sack of the city in 146 B.C. The evidence for a post-146 B.C. or interim period ceramic industry and its products are discussed in detail. Using the new Panayia Field chronology, the South Stoa and numerous previously excavated deposits at Corinth are re-assessed. Arguably, the most important Hellenistic structure in Corinth, the South Stoa, now appears to have been begun in the 290s rather than the 330s B.C. Attempts are also made to address the cultural and economic history of Hellenistic Corinth for the first time. For instance, the adoption of certain shapes into the local ceramic assemblage illustrates the influence of the Hellenistic koine on Corinthian culture. At the local level, the continued production of ceramic kraters in the late 3rd to early 2nd c. B.C. and their findspots seem to suggest that metal vessels were more commonly used in public spaces. In terms of trade, the data on imported fine ware and amphoras from more than 60 deposits clearly demonstrate the flow of goods through the city and Corinth’s role in the trade networks of the Hellenistic period. This analysis reveals a strong connection to Athens during the Macedonian occupation, increasing contact with Italy and the Aegean beginning in the late 3rd c. B.C. and the continuity of Corinth’s economic contacts into the interim period. This research therefore also contributes significantly to our understanding of this important commercial city’s external contacts during the Hellenistic period. | en |
| dc.description.department | Classics | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
| dc.identifier.slug | 2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2355 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2355 | en |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en |
| dc.subject | Hellenistic | en |
| dc.subject | Corinth | en |
| dc.subject | Pottery | en |
| dc.subject | Archaeology | en |
| dc.title | The Hellenistic pottery from the Panayia Field, Corinth : studies in chronology and context | en |
| dc.type.genre | thesis | en |