Browsing by Subject "disease control"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item An Environmental Perspective to Decision-making for the Control of Johne's Disease on Beef Ranches(2010-10-12) Benjamin, Lisa A.Biosecurity practices for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Mptb), the etiologic agent for Johne's disease (JD), are predicated on the fact that fecal-oral is the major route of infection and that Mptb is present in the environment of affected farms. The objectives of these studies were to describe perceived benefits of testnegative Level 4 status in the Voluntary Bovine Johne's Disease Control Program (VBJDCP), describe producer and veterinarian attitudes towards JD relevant biosecurity practices, compare 5 JD control options using a Markov model, determine if tangential flow filtration (TFF) increases the detection sensitivity for Mptb and describe the distribution of environmental predictors for Mptb survival. Twenty-five percent and 39% of beef producers in the VBJDCP reported that they received substantial or marginal benefits (financial and non-financial), respectively, from program participation. Producers suggested increased marketing opportunities to improve the VBJDCP. Producers in a cross-sectional mailed survey of attitudes towards biosecurity practices were more likely than veterinarians to agree that separating JD clinical or suspects from calves or heifers; acquiring replacements or additions from JD low-risk herds, testing for JD every 10 to 14 months and test and culling clinical suspects only were useful for control of JD. A state transition Markov model, with the environment as the source of Mptb, was used to compare 6 alternative control strategies for JD. Management and the probability of Mptb surviving 1 year in the environment were important determinants of the prevalence of subclinical JD on beef farms under the analyzed control strategies. Heterogenous distribution of environmental predictors for Mptb survival was observed in spatial risk maps. In conclusion, although some beef producers experienced gains from participation in the VBJDCP, the perceived program benefits could be improved by increased marketing and education on the advantages of participation. Specific problem areas should be addressed. The length of time Mptb survived in the environment was an important parameter in the Markov chain model. Additionally, due to the heterogenous distribution of environmental predictors, a multiscale approach to sampling and analysis should be useful.Item The Social Context of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Control in Texas: Foundations for Effective Risk Communication(2012-02-14) Delgado, Amy HaleyThe introduction of FMD into the US would have serious economic and societal effects on the livelihoods and sustainability of affected livestock producers. Livestock producers serve as an important line of defense in both detecting an introduction of FMD as well, helping to prevent disease spread. However, due to the complexity of moral, social, and economic issues surrounding the control of highly contagious diseases, producer cooperation during an outbreak may not be assured. This study was conducted using a mixed-methods approach, including qualitative analysis of interviews and quantitative analysis of a postal survey, in order to explore the factors likely to influence producer cooperation in FMD detection and control in Texas. Reporting of cattle with clinical signs of FMD in the absence of an outbreak was related to producers? beliefs about the consequences of reporting, beliefs about what other producers would do, trust in agricultural agencies, and their perception of the risk posed by FMD. During a hypothetical outbreak, intentions to report were determined by beliefs about the consequences of reporting, and perception of the risk posed by FMD. Intentions to gather and hold cattle when requested during an outbreak were determined by beliefs about the consequences of gathering and holding, beliefs about barriers to gathering and holding, trust in other producers, and perception of the risk posed by FMD. Compliance with animal movement restrictions was determined by experiential attitudes, beliefs about the availability of feed, space, and disinfection procedures, beliefs about what other producers would do, and perception of the risk posed by FMD. Recommendations for improving producer cooperation include targeting specific beliefs in both planning and communication, increasing transparency in the post-reporting process, planning for and communicating plans for maintaining business continuity in order to better inform risk perception, and partnering with organizations to ensure sustained and meaningful communication that supports trust between producers within the affected agricultural community.