Browsing by Subject "Soybeans"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Planning and knowledge : industrial agriculture, Grupo de Madres de Ituzaingó Anexo and gendered community organizing(2016-05) Torrado, Marla Judith; Sletto, Bjorn; Auyero, Javier; Lieberknecht, Katherine; Mueller, Elizabeth; Torres, RebeccaThis dissertation analyzes the planning discourse of a fragmented state and the local resistance to the expansion of genetically modified (GM) soybean production, focusing on the case of Barrio Ituazaingó Anexo in the province of Córdoba, Argentina. It illustrates how fragmentary forms of governance produce spaces for insurgent maneuvering through disjunctions in state practices. I focus on the gender-based strategies and representations that allowed a women’s group, the Grupo de Madres de Barrio Ituzaingó Anexo, to attain a degree of visibility unavailable to other groups and achieve political gains in the struggle against GM soybean. As a small, women-led community organization, the Grupo de Madres emerged more than 10 years ago when 15 women from the neighborhood grew alarmed by the great number of children and adults who were ill with cancer. Their struggle with different levels of government and the state’s vision for the planning and development of the agrarian sector as an important revenue generator is an example of the tensions between localized productions of knowledge vis-à-vis rational visions of planning. This dissertation discusses the consequences of top-down planning strategies and examines the steps needed to ameliorate negative impacts of development projects at the local level. It also presents a poignant example of gender-based organizing: despite the numerous groups that had formed in Argentina, it was this small group of women who finally was able to demonstrate how the production of genetically modified crops was literally poisoning people. The national and international visibility they gained through their struggle served to legitimize their experiences and daily routines as a valid source of knowledge. This examination of a fragmented state also reveals the opportunities bottom-up groups have when maneuvering through the system to gain access to political spaces not usually available to them. Additionally, this analysis points to the complexity of such fragmented state practices, as tensions arise when some state governmental agencies accept the situated knowledge presented by communities, while other still push against it. Lastly, this dissertation contributes to discussions on knowledge production in planning, particularly the disconnection between formal, institutionalized and science-based rationalities in planning versus informal, situated knowledge.Item Upstream Transmission Effects of Generic Advertising and Promotion: The Case of Soybeans(2014-11-21) Lee, Sang HyeonThis dissertation aims at analyzing the effects of various assumptions that may affect the upstream transmission of the benefits of commodity checkoff programs. Despite the amount of econometric research on evaluation of the effects of checkoff programs for producer benefits, little empirical research has focused on the various simplifying assumptions often made in those analyses that may influence the rate and extent of the retail-to-farm transmission of generic advertising and promotion effects. The first part of this study is a qualitative analysis of the world soybean and soybean products markets. Then the conceptual model is proposed and discussed. A model of world soybean and soybean markets has been developed which relaxes all of the simplifying assumptions often made in analyses of commodity checkoff programs. The model is used to analyze the implications of those assumptions for the upstream transmission of the returns of the soybean checkoff program to producers. After estimating the econometric parameters of the model, the model has been simulated over history as a means of model validation. Then the model has been simulated again assuming that the U.S. soybean checkoff program had not existed over history. The differences from the simulation results by the baseline simulation are considered as the base case against which all other simulation results are compared. The base case results indicate that the soybean checkoff program has been highly effective over the study period returning $6.9 in revenue to soybean producers for every checkoff dollar spent. This upstream transmission of the benefits of the soybean checkoff program is analyzed through a series of simulations with the world soybean model in which the simplifying assumptions made by other checkoff program analyses. These are imposed on the model including the assumptions of no supply response, no price response, no government intervention, no free riders, no domestic supply chain linkages, no global supply chain linkages, no checkoff investments in production research and no promotion programs at multiple levels of the supply chain. The results of the scenario simulations provide the evidence that simplifying assumptions made in checkoff program analyses can seriously bias the calculation of the benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) for checkoff programs. Some assumptions have a tendency of overestimating the BCR for checkoff programs while others have a tendency of underestimating the BCR calculation. The implication of these findings is that analyses of checkoff programs must consider carefully the simplifying assumptions made to avoid seriously under- or over-estimating the returns of those programs to producers.