Browsing by Subject "Rhetoric, Ancient"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Civic voice in Elizabethan parliamentary oratory: the rhetoric and composition of speeches delivered at Westminister in 1566(2008-05) Seward, Daniel Edward, 1971-; Ferreira-Buckley, Linda, 1959-; Woods, Marjorie Curry, 1947-The revival of classical rhetoric has come to be seen as a defining feature of the Renaissance, one manifest in a vast body of educational literature and cultural commentary. This discourse borrows and reshapes principles of Greek and Roman rhetoricians for contemporary social purposes. Much of the early scholarship on this cultural trend emphasizes the connection between the revived classical rhetoric and the self-conscious civic humanism apparent in school curricula and learned culture. The figure of the orator played an especially important role in this movement. Scholars have pointed out that the orator was presented by many educators and social critics as a noble vir civilis, one learned in literature, articulate in speech, and active in civil society. While Renaissance reformulations of classical oratory and emphases on the figure of the orator have been studied quite extensively as they appear in written works of the period, much less attention has been given to civic orations actually delivered. This study attempts to redress that gap in our understanding of early modern civic discourse, especially by investigating the triangulated relationship between humanist rhetorical education, Renaissance concepts of the power of eloquence, and civic speech as an institutionalized rhetorical practice. Parliament, often compared by Tudor writers to the Greek Areopagus and Roman Senate, provides an ideal locus of investigation, since the speeches delivered there were categorically civic in nature and regularly addressed the traditional subjects of classical deliberative oratory. Yet close analyses of speeches from Elizabeth I's 1566 session reveal that the common Renaissance images of the orator are unsuitable for characterizing the expressions of civic voice exhibited in actual public speaking, just as the classical codification of civic speech provides an insufficient hermeneutic tool for understanding the rhetorical purposes of orations delivered in Tudor institutions. Parliamentary orators did not see the revived classical rhetoric as the only, or even the primary, tool for composing orations in civic venues, but rather drew significantly upon institutional customs, procedural gestures, and alternative language arts, such as dialectic and sermonic prophesying, in order to establish finely nuanced stances within the rhetorical situation.Item The untold story about Greek rational thought: Buddhist and other Indian rationalist influences on sophist rhetoric(Texas Tech University, 2000-12) Rahula, BasnagodaDuring the fifth and the early fourth century B. C. E.. Greek Sophist rhetoricians developed rational thinking in many fields such as in epistemology, anthropology, sociology, religion, and politics. Despite the popular belief that the traditional Greek society provided the influential sources for sophist rationalists, the dissertation argues that Greeks sophist thinkers-Protagoras, Gorgias, Antiphon, Critias, and others-were mainly influenced by Buddhist and other Indian rationalist thinking that was prevalent in India prior to the rise of the Greek sophist movement. This dissertation is the first in-depth study of Buddhist and other Indian rationalist influences on Greek sophist rhetoric. After the introduction that prepares the background for the discussion in the dissertation, Chapter II deals with the natural origin and development of Indian rationality. As a reaction to the social difficulties caused by the metaphysical and ideological concepts invented by the early Hindu tradition, Indian skeptics, materialists, Jains, and Buddhists developed rational argument against Hindu beliefs. In this development, the Brahmin myths of creation, transmigration of the soul, and Brahma were challenged vigorously by the rationalist traditions. Also, the competition between the orthodox Hindu beliefs and the rationalists' free inquiry about those beliefs gave rise to other rhetorical techniques such as style, organization, and presentation of arguments. Chapter III discusses the parallel development of rational thought in Greece with attention to the possible influence of Indian concepts on Greek thinkers from the sixth century B. C. E. Attention is drawn in this chapter mainly to Pythagoras, Empedocles. and Democritus, the forefathers of Greek sophist rhetoric, as the followers of Indian rational concepts. Chapter IV discusses in detail the similarities between Indian and Greek rational thought. Here, the rationalist concepts of Protagoras, Gorgias, and several other sophist thinkers, as well as their techniques in presentation, are closely evaluated in the light of Indian rationality in order to indicate a possible Indian influences on the Older Sophists. Chapter V reveals more evidence of possible influence, easy accessibility to Indian concepts in Greece and in Persia, and the ancient routes of communication between India and Greece.