Browsing by Subject "Pore pressure prediction"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Pore pressure and fracture pressure prediction of deepwater subsalt environment wells in Gulf of Mexico(2011-08) Rabinovich, Vladimir M.; Gray, Kenneth E., Ph. D.; Syngaevsky, PavelThere are many complications associated with abnormally high fluid pressures in overpressured formations. Pore pressure can directly influence all parts of operations including drilling, geological studies, completion, and production. Accurate predictions of pore pressure and fracture pressure are vital aspects to the production and completion of safe, time efficient, and cost efficient projects. Knowledge of pressure distribution in the formation can greatly reduce complexities associated with drilling and completing a well. A three-method pore pressure and fracture pressure study was performed on two prospect deepwater wells located in the Gulf of Mexico. More than thirty offset wells in the greater region were initially analyzed for similarities with the two prospect wells. In the final analysis, only six wells were used to create pore pressure and fracture pressure models due to inconsistencies in similarities or lack of usable data in many of the offset wells. Pore pressure and fracture pressure models were constructed for the offset wells, and then applied and calibrated for the two prospect wells using drilling data such as mud weights, MDTs (Modular Dynamic Testing), and LOTs (Leak-off Test). Three types of pore pressure and fracture pressure models were used in the study: Eaton’s deep resistivity method; Eaton’s acoustic sonic method; and Bower’s interval seismic velocity method. Pore pressure and fracture pressure prediction was complicated by abnormal pressure in the formation due to undercompaction and seals. Both prospects were located in a deep subsalt environment. Low permeability and traps prevents fluid from escaping as rapidly as pore space compacts thus creating overpressure. Drilling through salt in deep water is expensive and risky. Elevated pore pressure and reduced fracture pressure underneath salt seals can create very tight mud weight windows and cause many drilling problems, as seen in the results of the offset wells’ pore pressure and fracture pressure models. Results indicate very small pore pressure and fracture pressure windows, or mud weight windows, because of overpressures in the formation caused by such a deep subsalt environment. Many casing points were needed in the final casing design of prospect wells to accommodate the smaller mud weight windows. Pore pressure has the most significant increase immediately below the salt, while the mud weight window remained constant or decreased with depth. The average mud weight window ranged between 1 to 2 pounds per gallon below the salt.Item Pore pressure prediction using multicomponent PS-wave seismic velocities : Columbus Basin, Trinidad W. I.(2006-05) Kumar, Kimberly Melissa, 1981-; Ferguson, Robert J., Ph. D.I estimate overpressure in a seismic cross-section along a 12km traverse associated with a 2D/4C OBC line in the Columbus Basin, Trinidad, West Indies, where shallow gas reduces both data quality and apparent seismic velocity for P-waves, using a modified Eaton's equation for PS-waves. Pore pressure prediction using the modified Eaton's method involves velocity analysis, conversion of the stacking velocities to interval velocities via the Dix's equation, converting the interval velocity trends to pressures and mudweights, and comparison of the predictions to 3 wells surrounding the seismic line. In the presence of shallow gas, the magnitude and areal extent of seismically derived P-wave and PS-wave velocity deviates from regional trends along the seismic line. PS-waves show a more accurate areal extent of velocity deviation due to overpressure than the P-wave, which is also affected by the presence of shallow gas. I verify my derived velocities and predicted-pressure values using sonic log data and observed pressure from 3 wells. Direct comparison between the sonic-derived velocities and the seismic-derived velocities shows that shallow gas reduces P-wave velocity, and that PS-wave velocity is less affected. Pressure prediction is verified using mudweights and formation tests from well logs and drilling reports. I find pressure predictions associated with P-waves, especially in areas of shallow gas are less reliable than for pressure predictions using PS-waves. I conclude that PS-wave velocity provides a superior map of overpressure in this region in areas with shallow gas clouds.