Browsing by Subject "Bayesian Model Selection"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Bayesian Model Selection for High-dimensional High-throughput Data(2012-07-16) Joshi, AdarshBayesian methods are often criticized on the grounds of subjectivity. Furthermore, misspecified priors can have a deleterious effect on Bayesian inference. Noting that model selection is effectively a test of many hypotheses, Dr. Valen E. Johnson sought to eliminate the need of prior specification by computing Bayes' factors from frequentist test statistics. In his pioneering work that was published in the year 2005, Dr. Johnson proposed using so-called local priors for computing Bayes? factors from test statistics. Dr. Johnson and Dr. Jianhua Hu used Bayes' factors for model selection in a linear model setting. In an independent work, Dr. Johnson and another colleage, David Rossell, investigated two families of non-local priors for testing the regression parameter in a linear model setting. These non-local priors enable greater separation between the theories of null and alternative hypotheses. In this dissertation, I extend model selection based on Bayes' factors and use nonlocal priors to define Bayes' factors based on test statistics. With these priors, I have been able to reduce the problem of prior specification to setting to just one scaling parameter. That scaling parameter can be easily set, for example, on the basis of frequentist operating characteristics of the corresponding Bayes' factors. Furthermore, the loss of information by basing a Bayes' factors on a test statistic is minimal. Along with Dr. Johnson and Dr. Hu, I used the Bayes' factors based on the likelihood ratio statistic to develop a method for clustering gene expression data. This method has performed well in both simulated examples and real datasets. An outline of that work is also included in this dissertation. Further, I extend the clustering model to a subclass of the decomposable graphical model class, which is more appropriate for genotype data sets, such as single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Efficient FORTRAN programming has enabled me to apply the methodology to hundreds of nodes. For problems that produce computationally harder probability landscapes, I propose a modification of the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to extract information regarding the important network structures in the data. This modified algorithm performs well in inferring complex network structures. I use this method to develop a prediction model for disease based on SNP data. My method performs well in cross-validation studies.Item Population SAMC, ChIP-chip Data Analysis and Beyond(2011-02-22) Wu, MingqiThis dissertation research consists of two topics, population stochastics approximation Monte Carlo (Pop-SAMC) for Baysian model selection problems and ChIP-chip data analysis. The following two paragraphs give a brief introduction to each of the two topics, respectively. Although the reversible jump MCMC (RJMCMC) has the ability to traverse the space of possible models in Bayesian model selection problems, it is prone to becoming trapped into local mode, when the model space is complex. SAMC, proposed by Liang, Liu and Carroll, essentially overcomes the difficulty in dimension-jumping moves, by introducing a self-adjusting mechanism. However, this learning mechanism has not yet reached its maximum efficiency. In this dissertation, we propose a Pop-SAMC algorithm; it works on population chains of SAMC, which can provide a more efficient self-adjusting mechanism and make use of crossover operator from genetic algorithms to further increase its efficiency. Under mild conditions, the convergence of this algorithm is proved. The effectiveness of Pop-SAMC in Bayesian model selection problems is examined through a change-point identification example and a large-p linear regression variable selection example. The numerical results indicate that Pop- SAMC outperforms both the single chain SAMC and RJMCMC significantly. In the ChIP-chip data analysis study, we developed two methodologies to identify the transcription factor binding sites: Bayesian latent model and population-based test. The former models the neighboring dependence of probes by introducing a latent indicator vector; The later provides a nonparametric method for evaluation of test scores in a multiple hypothesis test by making use of population information of samples. Both methods are applied to real and simulated datasets. The numerical results indicate the Bayesian latent model can outperform the existing methods, especially when the data contain outliers, and the use of population information can significantly improve the power of multiple hypothesis tests.