Rotordynamic coefficients for a load-between-pad, flexible-pivot tilting pad bearing at high loads

dc.contributorChilds, Dara W.
dc.creatorHensley, John Eric
dc.date.accessioned2006-10-30T23:32:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-07T19:52:29Z
dc.date.available2006-10-30T23:32:40Z
dc.date.available2017-04-07T19:52:29Z
dc.date.created2006-08
dc.date.issued2006-10-30
dc.description.abstractThe dynamic and static performance of a flexure-pivot tilting pad bearing is presented at a load between pad configuration for various load and speed combinations. A similar work performed on the same bearing at lower loads ranging from 0-1 MPa (0-150 psi) by Al-Ghasem was tested, whereas the current work investigates effects in the load range between 1-2.2 MPa (150-320 psi). The bearing design parameters include: 4 pads with pad arc angle 72???? and 50% pivot offset, pad axial length 0.0762 m (3 in), pad radial clearance 0.254 mm (0.010 in), bearing radial clearance 190.5 ????m (0.0075 in), preload 0.25, and shaft nominal diameter of 0.11684 m (4.600 in). An important distinction between the two sets of tests is the difference in experimental bearing radial clearance, which for this case measured 208 ????m (0.00082 in), and for Al-Ghasem??????s was 165.1 ????m (0.0065 in). The rotordynamic coefficients are determined experimentally using a test rig equipped with motion and load sensors. The rig is modeled using Newton??????s laws, which is converted from the time to frequency domain using Fourier Transform to give complex dynamic stiffnesses. From the resulting complex dynamic stiffnesses the associated real and imaginary components are plotted as a function of excitation frequency and curve fitted via linear regression to give the rotordynamic coefficients. The primary objectives were to determine whether the real component of the complex dynamic stiffnesses could be better modeled with or without the mass coefficient and to contrast the rotordynamic coefficients with an analytical model. Only in the load range of 1 to 2.2 MPa were the unloaded direct mass coefficients near or at 0, which would allow for a [K][C] model to be used. The remaining real components are better represented with the mass term. The analytical model generally overpredicted the stiffness, damping and mass coefficients, especially for the direct components; the trends were generally consistent.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4404
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTexas A&M University
dc.subjectBearing
dc.subjectPivot
dc.titleRotordynamic coefficients for a load-between-pad, flexible-pivot tilting pad bearing at high loads
dc.typeBook
dc.typeThesis

Files