Show simple item record

dc.rights.availabilityUnrestricted.
dc.creatorWorthen, James B
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-14T23:17:10Z
dc.date.available2011-02-18T20:53:39Z
dc.date.available2016-11-14T23:17:10Z
dc.date.issued1995-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/14977en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough empirical investigation of the mnemonic effectiveness of bizarreness has been conducted for several decades, that research has yet to determine the roles and/or necessity of imaginal and verbal processing in obtaining bizarreness effects. The present study used procedures that produced a significant separation between imaginal and verbal processing, to demonstrate that bizarreness can be mnemonically effective regardless whether the bizarre elaboration is predominantly imaginal, predominantly verbal, or equivalently verbal and imaginal in nature. Similarly, bizarreness effects were obtained regardless of whether subjects generated images or mentally reproduced images provided for them. In general, the results support neither purely imaginal nor purely semantic accounts of bizarreness effects on recall, but are in keeping with a more inclusive expectation-violation explanation (Hirshman, Whelley & Palij, 1989) . The results also provide some support for the independent effects of intralist and extralist distinctiveness (i.e., Worthen & Marshall, in press) and dual coding theory (Paivio, 1971, 1991).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTexas Tech Universityen_US
dc.subjectHuman information processingen_US
dc.subjectImagery (Psychology)en_US
dc.subjectRecognition (Psychology)en_US
dc.titleDistinctiveness of sentences and images and the bizarreness effect
dc.typeDissertation


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record