Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   TDL DSpace Home
    • Federated Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • University of Texas at Austin
    • View Item
    •   TDL DSpace Home
    • Federated Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • University of Texas at Austin
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Attribunal processes concerning medication taking and their subsequent effects on fear reduction during exposure-based treatment

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2006-05
    Author
    Powers, Mark Bradley, 1971-
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The primary aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of attributions on fear reduction by having participants undergo exposurebased treatment in the context of an inactive medication that they were led to believe made the exposures easier (informed that the medication had a relaxing/sedating side-effect profile) or made the exposures more difficult (informed that the medication had an activating side-effect profile). Participants (N = 95) displaying marked claustrophobic fear were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 conditions: (a) Exposure Only (EO), (b) Exposure + Pill Placebo + Arousal Instruction (EPA attribution for pill interference), (c) Exposure + Pill Placebo + Neutral Instruction (EPN), (d) Exposure + Pill Placebo + Relaxation Instruction (EPR attribution for pill facilitation), (e) credible psychological placebo treatment (PLT), or (f) wait-list (WL). Consistent with prediction, results showed that an attribution for pill facilitation (EPR: relaxing/sedating instruction) interfered with fear reduction and led to higher relapse. Contrary to prediction, an attribution for pill interference (EPA: arousal instruction) did not outperform the other exposure conditions. Clinically significant improvement rates at posttreatment were as follows: EO = 73%, EPA = 75%, EPN = 78%, EPR = 76%, PLT = 60%, WL = 10%. Clinically significant improvement rates at follow-up were as follows: EO = 87%, EPA = 85%, EPN = 89%, EPR = 53%, PLT = 40%, WL = 30%. Relapse rates at follow-up were as follows: EO=0%, EPA=0%, EPN=0%, and EPR=39%. The deleterious effects of the relaxation instructions were fully mediated by attributions about the helpful effects of the medication reducing the variance accounted for by treatment from 30% to 7%. Findings suggest the importance of assessing attributions during combined exposure-based and pharmacological treatments and attention to a slow medication taper and reapplication of exposure during the taper.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2152/13070
    Collections
    • University of Texas at Austin

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by @mire NV