Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDonnelly, Phillip J. (Phillip Johnathan), 1969-
dc.contributor.authorWright, Seth Andrew.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-11T14:24:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-07T19:35:06Z
dc.date.available2014-06-11T14:24:01Z
dc.date.available2017-04-07T19:35:06Z
dc.date.copyright2014-05
dc.date.issued2014-06-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/9115
dc.description.abstractI argue that Order and Disorder (1679), Lucy Hutchinson’s biblical epic on Genesis, is a meditative poem, while claiming that Hutchinson’s study of Independent theologian John Owen’s covenant theology informed her narration of the events in Genesis. I offer a reading of the poem as a whole to show how these claims illuminate Hutchinson’s construal of Genesis. These claims permit me to engage scholarly literature on three heads. First, by demonstrating that Order and Disorder is a meditative poem, I seek to extend the current discussion of seventeenth-century meditative poetry to include poems narrating the content of the poet’s meditation alongside poems narrating the process. Second, by showing Order and Disorder’s specific theological background, I challenge accounts claiming Lucretian atomism and Republican politics as the poem’s intellectual foundation. Finally, I offer the first extended account of meditation in Owen’s theology. Chapter One puts Hutchinson and her work in the historical and critical context, while Chapter Two argues that Owen understood meditation as an intellectual duty whose final cause is communion with God by understanding biblical revelation, and that Hutchinson assumed a similar view in Order and Disorder. As she discerned scriptural truth through meditation, Hutchinson rejected the Epicurean philosophy she had encountered while translating Lucretius. In Chapter Three, I argue that Theologoumena Pantodapa, Owen’s major treatise on covenant theology, which Hutchinson studied closely, implicitly confronts Thomas Hobbes’s contract theory by arguing that communion with God is the highest end of humanity. Chapters Four—Six show how Hutchinson’s approach to meditation and covenant undergird her dilations of Genesis 1—3 in Cantos 1—5. By contending that people can commune with God by meditating on Creation, Providence, and the covenant, Hutchinson denies the ontological materialism found in Lucretius. Finally, Chapters Seven and Eight argue that Hutchinson uses Cantos 6—20 to narrate Genesis 4—31 in terms of an Independent ecclesiology grounded in Owen’s covenant theology. By claiming that the Church is distinguished by acknowledging Providence through meditation, Hutchinson contests the definition of the Church in the Act of Uniformity. The Epilogue suggests Owen regarded Hutchinson’s meditative project as successful.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisheren
dc.rightsBaylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact librarywebmaster@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.subjectLucy Hutchinson.en_US
dc.subjectJohn Owen.en_US
dc.subjectMeditation.en_US
dc.subjectEcclesiology.en_US
dc.subjectIndependency.en_US
dc.subjectGenesis.en_US
dc.subjectLucretius.en_US
dc.subjectThomas Hobbes.en_US
dc.subjectSeventeenth century.en_US
dc.subjectTheologoumena pantodapa.en_US
dc.subjectCovenant theology.en_US
dc.subjectMeditative poetry.en_US
dc.subjectEnglish republicanism.en_US
dc.subjectBiblical epic.en_US
dc.subjectOrder and disorder.en_US
dc.titleMeditative poetry, covenant theology, and Lucy Hutchinson's order and disorder.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnglish.en_US
dc.contributor.schoolsBaylor University. Dept. of English.en_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsNo access - Contact librarywebmaster@baylor.eduen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record