Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   TDL DSpace Home
    • Federated Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Texas A&M University at College Station
    • View Item
    •   TDL DSpace Home
    • Federated Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Texas A&M University at College Station
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Two-stage and Three-stage Virtual Impactor System for Bioaerosol Concentration

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2010-07-14
    Author
    Wen, Jing
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Circumferential Slot Virtual Impactor (CSVI) and The XMX/2A are two virtual impactors designed for sampling aerosol particles from a dilute environment by separating the aerosol into a fine and a coarse particle fraction. Dust particles in the ambient air may deposit within the virtual impactors and affect their performances. In this study the effect of dust loading within the CSVI on the efficiency of transmission was determined for particles from 0.49 to 9.9 mm in aerodynamic diameter (AD), and the performance of the three stage XMX/2A aerosol concentrator was characterized with 1 mm-9.9 ?m AD polystyrene latex microspheres (PSL). In the first experimental configuration, the two-stage CSVI had a first stage inflow of 100 L/min and a second stage minor flow of 1 L/min, each stage operating at an inflow/minor flow ratio of 10. An In-line Virtual Impactor (IVI) was used as a pre-separator for sampling inlets to exclude large particles. When the 100 L/min IVI with the two-stage CSVI was tested with Arizona Fine Road Dust (ARD A-2) particles, the transmission efficiency dropped to 50% when the dust entering the two-stage CSVI accumulated to about 100 mg. When it was tested with ASHRAE dust, a decrease of 43% in the efficiency was detected after more than 200mg ASHRAE dust entered the two-stage CSVI. After cleaning the CSVI unit, the transmission efficiency returned to 99%, which indicated that the dust dissemination resulted in the plugging of the CSVI unit. The transmission efficiency of CSVI dropped more quickly below 50% when tested with the ARD A-2 dust, which had smaller particle sizes. In the second configuration, XMX/2A, a three-stage aerosol concentrator designed to draw 800 L/min of air was used at a measured sampling flow rate of 742 L/min. XMX/2A equipped with an inlet was tested with 1 mm-9.9 mm AD PSL in a testing chamber. The peak transmission efficiency of XMX/2A was 39.5% for 8 mm AD PSL. By using the room air as cooling air and introducing dilution air to the flow cell, the transmission efficiency of each particle size increased. A combination of monodisperse PSL and oleic acid particles represent the performance of CSVI. In the IVI-CSVI dust test, the CSVI unit SN003 had the best performance when tested with ASHRAE dust. XMX/2A had relatively low transmission efficiency when tested with PSL particles in the chamber.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7576
    Collections
    • Texas A&M University at College Station

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by @mire NV