Show simple item record

dc.contributorAyers, Walter
dc.contributorMcVay, Duane
dc.creatorWang, Jianwei
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-14T23:54:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-16T00:01:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-07T19:54:16Z
dc.date.available2010-01-14T23:54:56Z
dc.date.available2010-01-16T00:01:45Z
dc.date.available2017-04-07T19:54:16Z
dc.date.created2008-12
dc.date.issued2010-01-14
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-12-222
dc.description.abstractThe demand for oil and gas is increasing yearly, whereas proven oil and gas reserves are being depleted. The potential of stripper oil and gas fields to supplement the national energy supply is large. In 2006, stripper wells accounted for 15% and 8% of US oil and gas production, respectively. With increasing energy demand and current high oil and gas prices, integrated reservoir studies, secondary and tertiary recovery methods, and infill drilling are becoming more common as operators strive to increase recovery from stripper oil and gas fields. The primary objective of this research was to support optimized production of oil and gas from stripper well fields by evaluating one stripper gas field and one stripper oil field. For the stripper gas field, I integrated geologic and engineering data to build a detailed reservoir characterization model of the Second White Specks (SSPK) reservoir in Garden Plains field, Alberta, Canada. The objectives of this model were to provide insights to controls on gas production and to validate a simulation-based method of infill drilling assessment. SSPK was subdivided into Units A ? D using well-log facies. Units A and B are the main producing units. Unit A has better reservoir quality and lateral continuity than Unit B. Gas production is related primarily to porosity-netthickness product and permeability and secondarily to structural position, minor structural features, and initial reservoir pressure. For the stripper oil field, I evaluated the Green River formation in the Wells Draw area of Monument Butte field, Utah, to determine interwell connectivity and to assess optimal recovery strategies. A 3D geostatistical model was built, and geological realizations were ranked using production history matching with streamline simulation. Interwell connectivity was demonstrated for only major sands and it increases as well spacing decreases. Overall connectivity is low for the 22 reservoir zones in the study area. A water-flood-only strategy provides more oil recovery than a primary-then-waterflood strategy over the life of the field. For new development areas, water flooding or converting producers to injectors should start within 6 months of initial production. Infill drilling may effectively produce unswept oil and double oil recovery. CO2 injection is much more efficient than N2 and CH4 injection. Water-alternating-CO2 injection is superior to continuous CO2 injection in oil recovery. The results of this study can be used to optimize production from Garden Plains and Monument Butte fields. Moreover, these results should be applicable to similar stripper gas and oil field fields. Together, the two studies demonstrate the utility of integrated reservoir studies (from geology to engineering) for improving oil and gas recovery.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectIntegrated reservoir studies
dc.subjectreservoir simulation and history matching
dc.subjectinterwell connectivity
dc.subjectrecovery strategies
dc.subjectinfill potential
dc.titleIntegrated Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Studies in Stripper Oil and Gas Fields
dc.typeBook
dc.typeThesis


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record