Show simple item record

dc.contributorMenzel, Christopher
dc.creatorSiu, Ho Kin
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-20T21:15:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-07T19:57:00Z
dc.date.available2010-01-20T21:15:56Z
dc.date.available2017-04-07T19:57:00Z
dc.date.created2008-05
dc.date.issued2010-01-20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-05-14
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the connections between the motivations of ante rem structuralism and the problem of automorphism. Ante rem structuralists are led to the problem of automorphism because of their commitment to the thesis of structure-relative identity. Ladyman's and Button's solutions to the problem are both unsatisfactory. The problem can be solved only if ante rem structuralists drop the thesis of structure-relative identity. Besides blocking the problem of automorphism, there are further reasons why the thesis has to be dropped. (i) The purported metaphysical and epistemic purchase of adopting the thesis can be put into doubt. (ii) Primitive identity within a mathematical structure is more in line with ante rem structuralist's commitment to the faithfulness constraint and to the ontological priority of structure over positions. However, the cost of dropping the thesis is that ante rem structuralists cannot provide a satisfactory solution to Benacerraf's problem of multiple reductions of arithmetic.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectautomorphism
dc.subjectstructuralism
dc.subjectidentity
dc.titleAnte rem Structuralism and the Myth of Identity Criteria
dc.typeBook
dc.typeThesis


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record