The impacts of recent tax legislation on dividend policy and investment

Date

2009-05-15

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This dissertation examines firms? reactions to two changes in tax law intended to increase dividend payout and capital investment, the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act (JCWAA) of 2002 and the Jobs Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (JGTRRA) of 2003. Chapter IV assesses whether firms assuage agency conflicts between management and shareholders created by changes in individual-level taxes on dividends, focusing on the impact of board independence on changes in management compensation and dividend policies. Data analyses suggest that greater board independence mitigates the effects of both CEO stock and option holdings on dividend increases. Additionally, firms appear to implicitly dividend-protect options through increased cash compensation, effectively reimbursing CEOs for decreases in option value. Firms that did not increase dividends in the first year following the passage of JGTRRA decreased option grants to induce greater future dividend payouts. Chapter V examines the relation between contemporary dividend increases and future earnings around JGTRRA. Specifically, I investigate whether firms increase dividends in response to shareholder demands, and I examine the market reaction to preand post-JGTRRA dividend changes. In addition, I focus on the dividend policies of growth firms, testing between firm maturation (Grullon et al. 2002) and tax-based explanations. Results suggest that dividends are less explanatory as to future earnings in the post-JGTRRA period. Post-JGTRRA dividend increases by growth firms are consistent with tax motives rather than firm maturation because growth firms paying dividends have greater investment in the post-JGTRRA period. Chapter VI examines the effects of JCWAA and JGTRRA provisions enacted to increase business capital expenditures through increased depreciation allowances. I develop a model to predict what firms? capital expenditures would have been in the absence of these acts, comparing the actual and predicted values. I find firms significantly increased purchases of qualified assets but decreased nonqualified asset purchases, netting only a marginal overall increase in capital expenditures. Finally, I examine the impact of these acts on leasing transactions, finding that low marginal tax rate firms significantly increased use of operating leases following the passage of JCWAA, whereas firms with higher MTRs decreased lease transactions.

Description

Keywords

Citation