Show simple item record

dc.contributorPritchard, Amanda Bayneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-23T01:56:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-24T21:40:32Z
dc.date.available2007-08-23T01:56:45Z
dc.date.available2011-08-24T21:40:32Z
dc.date.issued2007-08-23T01:56:45Z
dc.date.submittedDecember 2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/443
dc.description.abstractSlave women resisted being sexually dominated by white men, by refusing to accept that their lives were beyond their control. By examining cases of slave women who resisted white sexually assertive men, I will display how women slave women resisted the status of sexual subjugation, and instead used their sexuality to manipulate situations to improve their quality of life. Slave women were not immune to the sexual corruption in the South, but they used their circumstances to provide themselves with a healthier lifestyle. Based upon a slave woman's response to the sexual advances of whites, one can determine that there are three types of reactions--violent resistors, lifetime resistors, and virtuous resistors. I have characterized and identified the tactics and stages in which slave women followed these types of resistance. Confined by social stigmas and systems that defined southern life, slave women had to execute their behaviors so that they sidestepped the consequences of their deviant behavior while still securing their own desires. Resistant slave women surely impacted slavery and attempted to mold it to suit their needs. The desires of masters may have prevailed--but not without interference and reactions from the slaves.en_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherHistoryen_US
dc.titleFiends Who Bear The Shapes Of Men: Case Studies On White Male And Black Female Relationships In The Southen_US
dc.typeM.A.en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record